<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multiply your Java apps by 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainsnorkel.com/2006/05/17/multiply-your-java-desktop-apps-by-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainsnorkel.com/2006/05/17/multiply-your-java-desktop-apps-by-20/</link>
	<description>Manifesto-driven development.  Eclectic thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://brainsnorkel.com/2006/05/17/multiply-your-java-desktop-apps-by-20/comment-page-1/#comment-5343</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 01:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsnorkel.com/2006/05/17/multiply-your-java-desktop-apps-by-20/#comment-5343</guid>
		<description>Hey!  This post isn&#039;t compatible with Cynicism 1.0
I agree with you re: no substitute for rich desktop apps.
I think that the fiddliness and flakiness of non-mainstream AJAX apps has a lot to do with the development and test environments that they spawn from.  I would hope that this (and other tools) lower the barrier to entry for AJAX and increase the average amount QC. Increasing numbers of zero-install, usable and responsive, traditionally  applications like we see from Yahoo and Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!  This post isn&#8217;t compatible with Cynicism 1.0</p>
<p>I agree with you re: no substitute for rich desktop apps.  </p>
<p>I think that the fiddliness and flakiness of non-mainstream AJAX apps has a lot to do with the development and test environments that they spawn from.  I would hope that this (and other tools) lower the barrier to entry for AJAX and increase the average amount QC. Increasing numbers of zero-install, usable and responsive, traditionally  applications like we see from Yahoo and Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair</title>
		<link>http://brainsnorkel.com/2006/05/17/multiply-your-java-desktop-apps-by-20/comment-page-1/#comment-5336</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 23:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsnorkel.com/2006/05/17/multiply-your-java-desktop-apps-by-20/#comment-5336</guid>
		<description>Hmm. As much as I like AJAX apps when they&#039;re done well (as Gmail is) there still isn&#039;t any substitute for a desktop app, or better still a desktop app that uses a web API to store data centrally. In other words I use Mail.app unless it&#039;s blocked by a firewall, in which case the AJAX interface is great.
All this is by way of saying that the really interesting stuff is on the server side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. As much as I like AJAX apps when they&#8217;re done well (as Gmail is) there still isn&#8217;t any substitute for a desktop app, or better still a desktop app that uses a web API to store data centrally. In other words I use Mail.app unless it&#8217;s blocked by a firewall, in which case the AJAX interface is great.</p>
<p>All this is by way of saying that the really interesting stuff is on the server side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
