A rock-solid model for an Australian Republic
1-Feb-2006My parents in-law have advocated simple model for an Australian Republic for some time. I must mention that I initially rolled my eyes at it, yet I find it more and more appealing as time passes. I think it’s worth putting into the public domain for serious consideration.
It’s a complex series of constitutional amendments, but it can be summarised for republican model-collectors as - change the head of state from the reigning Monarch of the United Kingdom to Uluru (Ayers Rock).

That would probably be easily done by amending the Constitutional Act so that instead of saying that the word “Queen” refers to the Queen’s heirs and successors in the sovereignty of the United Kingdom it would refer to Queen’s heirs, successors or a monolith elected by the Australian people.
Before electing Uluru, we’d have to be sure to get the permission of the Pitjantjatjara people. However, there are plenty of other worthy Australian monoliths that could be considered if Uluru makes itself unavailable for election.
Uluru has a lot going for it that our present head of state and her viceroy do not:
- People can easily remember its name
- Its history can be scientifically discovered. There will be no more heads of state with problematic histories accidentally appointed by idealogue Prime Ministers
- No real need for security. Our head of state would be quite difficult to kidnap or assassinate
Of course, there may be a few problems with understanding whether the monolith wants to dissolve parliament, alter the sitting days, or go on tour to meet other heads of state. Some circuit-breaker mechanism better than sitting in front of the rock and meditating would have to be developed. More details to be worked out according to the will of the people.
I’m sure that an Australian federal structure with a rock solid foundation would be the envy of the world.
Thanks to Happy A@Flickr for the image.






This is an inaccurate posting. The constitutional ammendments would not
David Latimer | 2-Aug-2006This is an inaccurate posting. The constitutional ammendments would not be complicated, as the Queen is mostly mentioned in passing and has no effect on the operation of government.
The Queen’s ministers would become “Uluru’s ministers”.
It would not be up to Uluru to resolve disputes, as the governor-general would be the representative of Uluru in the federal parliament. Governors would represent Uluru for each of the states.
The real problem with Uluru is that it is not directly elected. Surely there are other landmarks or geographic features which would like the chance to be Head of State. The three-sisters could make a joint nomination.
Checkout our forum http://www.7gs.com/copernican/
I sit corrected! Nothing says apolitical head of state like electing
Chris | 2-Aug-2006I sit corrected!
Nothing says apolitical head of state like electing a gorge. I’m thinking my next constitutional model will involve electing a symbolic absense.