<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ye Olde Manifesto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainsnorkel.com/2005/07/20/ye-olde-manifesto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainsnorkel.com/2005/07/20/ye-olde-manifesto/</link>
	<description>Manifesto-driven development.  Eclectic thoughts.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://brainsnorkel.com/2005/07/20/ye-olde-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-4188</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsnorkel.com/?p=156#comment-4188</guid>
		<description>If you reuse something, that sure can be a good thing™

My contention is that you should focus on meeting your current customer, not your (hypothetical) next customer's (hypothetical) requirements.  They're very hard to validate :)

re: Word processors/document processors - yeah - there's a paternal rule-of-thumb-guide to form, structure and content required to stoke up the fires of dissent.

I used to have something in my manifesto about showing other people mindmaps, and how this was like answering someone's question by pointing at your book collection and saying - "voila!"

Maybe I'll put that back in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you reuse something, that sure can be a good thing™</p>
<p>My contention is that you should focus on meeting your current customer, not your (hypothetical) next customer&#8217;s (hypothetical) requirements.  They&#8217;re very hard to validate :)</p>
<p>re: Word processors/document processors - yeah - there&#8217;s a paternal rule-of-thumb-guide to form, structure and content required to stoke up the fires of dissent.</p>
<p>I used to have something in my manifesto about showing other people mindmaps, and how this was like answering someone&#8217;s question by pointing at your book collection and saying - &#8220;voila!&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ll put that back in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny Kalsi</title>
		<link>http://brainsnorkel.com/2005/07/20/ye-olde-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-4187</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny Kalsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 01:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsnorkel.com/?p=156#comment-4187</guid>
		<description>I'm guessing the whole re-use thing only counts for requirements. I thought re-use was a good thing (tm).

Also, I thought word processors were bad news. I thought you needed document processors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing the whole re-use thing only counts for requirements. I thought re-use was a good thing &#8482;.</p>
<p>Also, I thought word processors were bad news. I thought you needed document processors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://brainsnorkel.com/2005/07/20/ye-olde-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-4185</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 01:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsnorkel.com/?p=156#comment-4185</guid>
		<description>I have no love for this template.

I don't think the my computer location is a killer for the most people don't seek out, or understand  trees argument.

I don't know why I focused on trees.  I think there is a more general point to make about developers' tendency to clone their IDE (even if Unix is their IDE) in the application they're building.  I guess they assume that if they're so productive with something that looks like this IDE, then all of their users will be too!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no love for this template.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the my computer location is a killer for the most people don&#8217;t seek out, or understand  trees argument.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why I focused on trees.  I think there is a more general point to make about developers&#8217; tendency to clone their IDE (even if Unix is their IDE) in the application they&#8217;re building.  I guess they assume that if they&#8217;re so productive with something that looks like this IDE, then all of their users will be too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair</title>
		<link>http://brainsnorkel.com/2005/07/20/ye-olde-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-4184</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsnorkel.com/?p=156#comment-4184</guid>
		<description>Styles in CSS are not your friend. Your h3 headings are bigger than your h2 headings!

Also agree 100% with your point(s) about trees. But in Win XP I don't think that "My Computer" is on the desktop by default any more. IIRC it's just the recycle bin.

Agree about Unfinished Sympathy though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Styles in CSS are not your friend. Your h3 headings are bigger than your h2 headings!</p>
<p>Also agree 100% with your point(s) about trees. But in Win XP I don&#8217;t think that &#8220;My Computer&#8221; is on the desktop by default any more. IIRC it&#8217;s just the recycle bin.</p>
<p>Agree about Unfinished Sympathy though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
