<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google vs MSN Search Beta: An unscientific study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainsnorkel.com/2004/11/12/google-vs-msn-search-beta-an-unscientific-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainsnorkel.com/2004/11/12/google-vs-msn-search-beta-an-unscientific-study/</link>
	<description>Manifesto-driven development.  Eclectic thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Things I've Seen</title>
		<link>http://brainsnorkel.com/2004/11/12/google-vs-msn-search-beta-an-unscientific-study/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Things I've Seen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsnorkel.com/?p=46#comment-130</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;MSN search&lt;/strong&gt;
MSN Search is now out in Beta. brainsnorkel isn&#039;t impressed...Based on 15 minutes of play my verdict is that I might use it when it&#8217;s more reliable, ranks results better, indexes my local PC, performs better than Google, and my...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>MSN search</strong><br />
MSN Search is now out in Beta. brainsnorkel isn&#8217;t impressed&#8230;Based on 15 minutes of play my verdict is that I might use it when it&#8217;s more reliable, ranks results better, indexes my local PC, performs better than Google, and my&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://brainsnorkel.com/2004/11/12/google-vs-msn-search-beta-an-unscientific-study/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsnorkel.com/?p=46#comment-127</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s too bad to launch a beta product if you have something that needs some seriously broad and deep testing that you can&#039;t get in a lab.  When you add the intended or unintended hype of a head-t-head battle for search engine world domination, your beta is going to cop some serious flak if it&#039;s not up to to job and threaten future interest...  like it&#039;s done to me :)

At least my flak is fresh, pure and natural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s too bad to launch a beta product if you have something that needs some seriously broad and deep testing that you can&#8217;t get in a lab.  When you add the intended or unintended hype of a head-t-head battle for search engine world domination, your beta is going to cop some serious flak if it&#8217;s not up to to job and threaten future interest&#8230;  like it&#8217;s done to me :)</p>
<p>At least my flak is fresh, pure and natural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair</title>
		<link>http://brainsnorkel.com/2004/11/12/google-vs-msn-search-beta-an-unscientific-study/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsnorkel.com/?p=46#comment-126</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/2004/11/11.html#a1112&quot;&gt;Jon Udell&lt;/a&gt; has an uncharacteristically cheeky take...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/2004/11/11.html#a1112">Jon Udell</a> has an uncharacteristically cheeky take&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair</title>
		<link>http://brainsnorkel.com/2004/11/12/google-vs-msn-search-beta-an-unscientific-study/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsnorkel.com/?p=46#comment-125</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20041111-4388.html&quot;&gt;Ars did a followup report&lt;/a&gt; on MSN search, confirming the result of your test, namely that it sometimes would &quot;fail on searches that should be obvious successes&quot;.

I can understand the logic of launching early, with a &quot;beta&quot; tag, but this is a really risky strategy for Microsoft. Early impressions of a product/service tend to linger, and this includes early problems that are subsequently fixed. A good example of this is the Apple Newton, that fixed it&#039;s initially bad handwriting recognition, but not before they got ridiculed on The Simpsons.

Another thing that occurs to me is that &quot;MSN Search&quot; does not verb well. &quot;Just MSN Search it&quot; does not have the same ring to it as &quot;Just Google it&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20041111-4388.html">Ars did a followup report</a> on MSN search, confirming the result of your test, namely that it sometimes would &#8220;fail on searches that should be obvious successes&#8221;.</p>
<p>I can understand the logic of launching early, with a &#8220;beta&#8221; tag, but this is a really risky strategy for Microsoft. Early impressions of a product/service tend to linger, and this includes early problems that are subsequently fixed. A good example of this is the Apple Newton, that fixed it&#8217;s initially bad handwriting recognition, but not before they got ridiculed on The Simpsons.</p>
<p>Another thing that occurs to me is that &#8220;MSN Search&#8221; does not verb well. &#8220;Just MSN Search it&#8221; does not have the same ring to it as &#8220;Just Google it&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

